She pointed out that deliberately damaging property before surrendering it did not demonstrate financial hardship.

It demonstrated a decision.

Brian’s attorney insisted there was no video of him causing the damage.

No eyewitness.

And that my father’s account was disputed.

The judge asked several questions.

Had Brian remained in possession of the home until the deadline?

Yes.

Had he retained the other set of keys?

Yes.

Was anyone alleging that I had caused the damage myself?

No.

Did Brian have a credible alternative explanation for the damaged walls, running water, and destruction of an item he’d specifically fought over during the divorce?

His attorney hesitated.

Finally, he admitted there was no clear alternative explanation.

Brian whispered urgently to him.

But his lawyer shook his head.

Then the judge delivered her decision.

Brian’s request to reduce my share of the remaining assets was denied.

The documented property damage was included in the financial accounting.