I think they’ll move.”
They moved on Wednesday.
Nathan’s lawyer sent a proposed settlement.
Ruth went through it line by line with me on a call that lasted two hours.
The initial offer was inadequate — it acknowledged the joint account withdrawals but valued them at less than half the documented total and made no provision for the years of tuition support.
“Reject it,” I said.
“Already drafted the response,” Ruth said.
The counter went back Thursday morning.
By Thursday afternoon, Nathan’s lawyer called again.
Ruth took the call and reported back.
“He wants a meeting,” she said.
“Nathan specifically.
He wants to meet with you directly, without lawyers.”
“No.”
“That’s what I told them.”
“Good.”
Friday brought a second proposal.
Better, but still short on the tuition contribution calculation.
Ruth and I went through it again.
“They’re getting closer,” she said.
“I think one more counter does it.”